Arnolds Health Care Plan: A Plan Wal-Mart Can Love
Despite the hype from media reports describing California Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneggers new health care proposal as the equivalent of universal health care coverage, the Terminators plan in reality shifts the responsibility for health care costs onto already overburdened workers and their families, says Art Pulaski, executive secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation.
Schwarzenegger offered a broad outline of a plan Jan. 8 that he says would cover uninsured Californians and require all residents to purchase health insurance. There is likely to be a long legislative fight over the proposal, which The New York Times says mirrors the plan in Massachusetts that requires working families to buy health insurance but requires little of employers.
Says Pulaski of the California plan: While the Governors health care proposal includes some positive elements, it is the wrong prescription for Californias health care crisis. This proposal will be a boon to insurance companies, but a bust for most workers. This plan requires all Californians to buy health insurance with no guarantee that it will be affordable or that coverage will be adequate. We are concerned that the plan creates an incentive for employers who currently provide health care to drop coverage and instead pay only a minimal tax.
Employers with 10 or more employees who do not provide health insurance for their workers will be required to pay into a state health care fund. But like the Massachusetts plan, employers payments into the state fund are so low [4 percent of payroll] many employers who now provide coverage at a higher cost would be encouraged to drop coverage and pay into the fund.
Like the Massachusetts program, the plan is short on guarantees of affordable coverage even while it promises to reach universal coverage through an individual mandate. Without a guarantee of access for all to affordable coverage, such a mandate would be unworkable and unfair.
Individuals above 250 percent of the poverty line ($24,500) will have to buy coverage without any help. Yet the plans that will be available can have deductibles as high as $5,000 and out-of-pocket limits of $7,500 for individuals (or $10,000 for a family). People at 300 percent of poverty would have to pay 21 percent of their income in premiums and deductibles for the minimal package before insurance starts to pick up some cost of care. By the time these individuals reach the $7,500 expenses cap, they will have spent 30 percent of their income on medical care.
Schwarzeneggers proposal relies on high deductible plans that will keep individuals from getting the care they need, despite his promise of reducing the cost of uncompensated care and promoting preventive care.
This is a plan that Wal-Mart can love and Wal-Mart workers will hate,said Pulaski. The proposed employer contribution is so low that even Wal-Mart, a corporation known for its minimal employee healthcare coverage, already exceeds the requirements. The governor says his proposal eliminates the hidden tax of the uninsured, but what hes proposed is a new tax on middle class families.
With the cost of health care soaring and more than 45 million people in the country without health insurance, the debate on how to provide quality and affordable health care for working families will only intensify in state legislatures and Congress this year.
Last year in Wisconsin, a coalition of labor, government and community organizations came together to develop the Wisconsin Health Care Partnership Plan. The plan requires employers to pay a fair share of health care costs for their employees, who would share health care costs through co-payments and deductibles.
- Mike Hall, http://blog.aflcio.org